Sunday, April 24, 2011
Monday, March 28, 2011
Health Care System Access for Deaf Women Talk
She discussed that according to Ubido J., Huntington J. Warburton D. 2002: health staff are unaware how to communicate; few deaf women fully understand what doctors say to them; and few women use health services. These are problems in .accessibility for Deaf women.
*The name of the client is withheld for safety and privacy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday, March 25, 2011
Rex Bernardo chosen by the World Economic Forum as one of the Young Global Leaders for 2011
Monday, March 21, 2011
Deaf Human Rights Seminar
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesusa Nofies is a BAPDST student of DLS-CSB. She is also the lone Deaf regular staffer of the Benildean. Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Disability Advocacy
“Much has been accomplished, but the world continues its struggle to create societies in which disabled persons enjoy the same opportunities as other members of the human family, and are viewed and treated as equal partners in the social, cultural, political and economic life of our communities.”
Kofi Annan, Beirut, Lebanon, 3 December 2001
WHAT IS DISABILITY?
The definition of disability has shifted over the past two or three decades. It used to be defined purely in medical terms as a health condition. This approach located ‘the problem of disability’ in the person with a disability and ‘the solution’ in treating the person with a disability. Now, disability is more often recognized as the interaction between a person and his or her environment, including the social, economic, legal and built environment. This understanding is endorsed by WHO and used in Australia [1].
DEFINITIONS – A DISABILITY ADVOCACY APPROACH
In an effort to promote the social model of disability – an approach that acknowledges three distinct barriers: attitudinal, institutional, and environmental, which marginalise and exclude people with impairments, it is important to understand the difference between disability and impairment. These two terms are often used interchangeably but have distinctly different meanings [2].
Impairment: “Any loss or abnormality of psychological, physiological, or anatomical structure or function”[3]
Disability: Is the outcome of the interaction between a person with an impairment and the attitudinal and the environmental barriers he/she may face [2].
MODELS OF DISABILITY
Medical Model • Views PwD as having physical problems to be cured
• PwD relegated to the passive role of patient, with medical personnel and care- professionals making many decisions
• Excessive focus on the desirability of fixing the disabled person’s impairment
• PwD become defined solely in terms of their diagnosis, as a patient with medical needs and no longer as a person with a whole range of needs.
• Services are designed for them and delivered to them, perhaps with the best of intentions, but with insufficient consultation
• Carers may become unacceptably powerful, making decisions about what is best for those in their care.
Social Model
• Identifies three major barriers that confront PwD:
• Physical (exclusion from the built environment)
• Institutional (systematic exclusion or neglect in social, legal, educational, religious, and political institutions), and
• Attitudinal (negative valuations of disabled people by non-disabled people)
• Removing these barriers is possible and has a hugely beneficial impact, both on the lives of disabled people and on the whole community
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: ADDC (Australian Disability and Development Consortium) is an Australian based, international network focusing attention, expertise and action on disability issues in developing countries; building on a human rights platform for disability advocacy.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Repost: Akbayan wins 20% Discount battle vs. Mercury Drug for PWDs by AKBAYAN PARTYLIST
Akbayan wins 20% Discount battle vs. Mercury Drug for PWDs
“A very good news for Filipinos with disabilities!” Akbayan said of the latest development in the battle to realize the rights and welfare persons with disabilities (PWDs): Mercury Drug finally folded to the combined pressure of PWD groups and Akbayan Party and pledged to honor the 20% discount for PWDs’ purchases of medicine.
“Simula sa susunod na buwan, lahat ng mga kababayan nating may kapansanan ay makakakuha na ng 20% discount mula sa lahat ng outlets ng Mercury Drugstore,” Akbayan Representative Walden Bello said on Tuesday. “We commend the decision of Mercury Drug to finally comply with the law.”
Akbayan joined Rep. Arturo Robes, the Chairperson of the House of Representatives Committee on Social Services, and members of organizations of Filipinos with disabilities in announcing the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the committee and Mercury Drug to signify the latter’s intention to reform its business practices and fully comply with the Magna Carta for PWDs. Mercury Drug management was represented by Atty. Edsel Manuel in the MOA signing.
The strongly-worded agreement ordered Mercury Drug to set up the appropriate system that would facilitate the provision of 20% discount on all medicine and medical supplies purchased by persons with disabilities within a month’s time. And to make sure that Mercury Drug does not back track on this commitment, the MOA requires Mercury Drug to provide periodic reports to the committee regarding their compliance with the law.
According to Akbayan Representative Walden Bello, thorough consultation with the various members of the sector revealed that Mercury Drug Corporation was the “biggest violator of the discount on medicines for the consumption of PWDs” that RA 9442 or the amended Magna Carta for PWDs required.
It is because of this track record that Bello issued Mercury Drug a warning:
“While we are glad that Mercury Drug finally decided to join us in ensuring the rights and welfare of PWDs, I wish to make it clear with the company’s management that we, Akbayan, our friends in the sector and our allies in Congress, will be watching very closely, and we will not hesitate to take the appropriate legal or legislative action should there be any indication that Mercury intends to abandon the agreement,” Bello said.
Bello explained that this victory has proven that the combined forces of marginalized groups and their representatives in government result in breaking the “cycle of abuse and the hegemony of the big, powerful corporations.”
“Nanindigan ang Akbayan na hindi makatarungang pagkakitaan ng isang malaking kumpanya ang mga kababayang nating may kapansanan kaya nag-file tayo ng resolution para imbestigahan ang isyu,” Bello explained. “At dahil sa ating sama-samang pakikibaka, napagtagumpayan natin ang Mercury Drug at naipanalo natin ang laban para sa murang gamot para sa mga kababayan nating may kapansanan.”
Bello also acknowledged the vital role that Lower House Committee on Social Services Chairperson Arturo Robes played in the resolution of the issue.
“Chair Robes is a very important ally in securing this victory for PWDs, he is a true defender of the rights of the weak and the marginalized,” Bello said. “He understood the injustice Filipinos with disabilities were confronted with, and he prioritized investigations into this issue. It was also because of his leadership we were able to pursue the matter and effectively pressure Mercury Drug into compliance.”
In conclusion, Bello affirmed his party’s commitment to the PWD sector.
“This is only the beginning. As our friends in the sector would agree, there’s still a lot of work to be done to turn the Magna Carta of PWDs into reality,” Bello concluded. “This well-earned victory will serve as inspiration to us in Congress to continue to fight alongside Filipinos with disabilities for their rights and welfare. Lalo nating pagtitibayin ang ating ugnayan upang patuloy tayong makapanalo ng isyu ng ating mga kababayang may kapansanan.”
Akbayan filed House Resolution 221 in August 2010, calling for an investigation into different drug stores’ refusal to provide PWDs the discount mandated by law. Through the combined efforts of the Committee, Akbayan and the members of PWDs, a concession from Mercury Drug Corporation was achieved after only 3 committee hearings.###



